Post by Caitlin on Jun 30, 2017 16:44:26 GMT -5
Basically how color theory was used, though most heavily in the prologue.
Personally I love color theory. Even in film, it is a master's method in storytelling.
"himself--the colors--and the book thief"
From the start. I'll begin like the book did: First the colors.
Colors are a continual abstract tool used many, many times by our narrator Death. There are a few things to say right off the bat about this. That perhaps it's to show Death does not see in black and white as expected. Actually, it is evident he sees colors as a vitality in his career. A coping method.
So far I've been stuck in a never-ending circle of the following three questions. They seem simple, but there are infinite wrong answers I remind myself; assumptions are dangerous. Other thoughts would be greatly appreciated too, I'm genuinely curious.
1) What connects the colors and the people who die at that time? My current answer is what they mean to Death. Starting with the colors. The colors define the death/person, therefore it is a one-sided connection. An open circuit.
2) The sky can only be so many colors, so how is it that Death sees or feels an entire spectrum? This one is a little more tricky. I think Death sees more than just the sky. Or maybe I'm thinking too literally. He did say the sky speaks color after all. So if the sky is symbolism, what do you think it's symbolizing?
3) Does Death sucking in the color relate to a craving for humane nature inside him? Is it where he connects, or, at least tries to?
This topic reminded me of the animated film called Perfect Blue, directed by the genius Satoshi Kon. Red was used with uneasy innuendo, a fearful change, and something fateful, growing faster than the main character could cope with. When things grew darker, the saturation grew denser.
I know Satoshi Kon used color brilliantly and originally. He created new meanings for colors predisposed. Which is exactly what Death is doing, but it's even more valuable because it reveals a lot about the essence of each lost soul. What each death meant to humanity and what each death meant to him. How he saw them, not as a person or another character or even as a narrator, but as a greater force too abstract for human intelligence. He saw them in a way we could not understand, using color in order to translate.
In conclusion - Markus Zusak is a master of using color theory. Such a monumental book could never use colors for what we already know - that would defeat the purpose. If Death used red to represent danger, why use red at all? Just say danger. Colors are really incredible when used in literature, simply because they can create level ground on abstract meanings.
At the end I'm still left with questions. I am dying to hear different opinions on Death and how he manipulates color.
Why does he use sky colors as a distraction? Why not another observation? Why do you think he relates colors to death, or even humanity?
Personally I love color theory. Even in film, it is a master's method in storytelling.
"himself--the colors--and the book thief"
From the start. I'll begin like the book did: First the colors.
Colors are a continual abstract tool used many, many times by our narrator Death. There are a few things to say right off the bat about this. That perhaps it's to show Death does not see in black and white as expected. Actually, it is evident he sees colors as a vitality in his career. A coping method.
So far I've been stuck in a never-ending circle of the following three questions. They seem simple, but there are infinite wrong answers I remind myself; assumptions are dangerous. Other thoughts would be greatly appreciated too, I'm genuinely curious.
1) What connects the colors and the people who die at that time? My current answer is what they mean to Death. Starting with the colors. The colors define the death/person, therefore it is a one-sided connection. An open circuit.
2) The sky can only be so many colors, so how is it that Death sees or feels an entire spectrum? This one is a little more tricky. I think Death sees more than just the sky. Or maybe I'm thinking too literally. He did say the sky speaks color after all. So if the sky is symbolism, what do you think it's symbolizing?
3) Does Death sucking in the color relate to a craving for humane nature inside him? Is it where he connects, or, at least tries to?
This topic reminded me of the animated film called Perfect Blue, directed by the genius Satoshi Kon. Red was used with uneasy innuendo, a fearful change, and something fateful, growing faster than the main character could cope with. When things grew darker, the saturation grew denser.
I know Satoshi Kon used color brilliantly and originally. He created new meanings for colors predisposed. Which is exactly what Death is doing, but it's even more valuable because it reveals a lot about the essence of each lost soul. What each death meant to humanity and what each death meant to him. How he saw them, not as a person or another character or even as a narrator, but as a greater force too abstract for human intelligence. He saw them in a way we could not understand, using color in order to translate.
In conclusion - Markus Zusak is a master of using color theory. Such a monumental book could never use colors for what we already know - that would defeat the purpose. If Death used red to represent danger, why use red at all? Just say danger. Colors are really incredible when used in literature, simply because they can create level ground on abstract meanings.
At the end I'm still left with questions. I am dying to hear different opinions on Death and how he manipulates color.
Why does he use sky colors as a distraction? Why not another observation? Why do you think he relates colors to death, or even humanity?